﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Payments Industry Regulatory Compliance: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2008-11-23T12:19:13Z</updated>
	<id>http://blog.bwplawyer.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link rel="self" href="http://blog.bwplawyer.com/comments/atom.aspx" />
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bwplawyer.com" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Visa IPO - Big Changes?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bwplawyer.com/2008/03/19/visa-ipo.aspx#comment-907364" />
		<id>tag:blog.bwplawyer.com,2008-03-20:907364</id>
		<author>
			<name>Broox Peterson</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-03-20T14:55:50Z</updated>
		<published>2008-03-20T14:55:50Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[I certainly agree that there are value add services that Visa can develop, and they are doing so whenever possible.&nbsp; I guess my point is that you can change the legal structure of Visa but you can't remove the association dynamics.&nbsp; Thank you for your comment.&nbsp; <br>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Visa IPO - Big Changes?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bwplawyer.com/2008/03/19/visa-ipo.aspx#comment-907127" />
		<id>tag:blog.bwplawyer.com,2008-03-20:907127</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bruce Cundiff</name>
			<uri>http://www.javelinstrategy.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-03-20T14:44:05Z</updated>
		<published>2008-03-20T13:01:38Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Outstanding analysis and I heartily agree. Everyone seems to be looking for the "what's going to be different," when the bulk of the analysis should be on "what's staying the same." The obsession with the brand value will continue and that manifests itself most with issuer relationship (and it's a mutually-agreeable position, regardless of rumblings from large issuers). I think there is a balance there, however -- there has to be some level of "value added services" that can be developed and implemented without drawing the ire or raising the competitive hackles of issuers, no? Can't wait to hear more from you on this!<br> <br> <br>]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>